Threads

Enlightenment models, Culadasa, and hemisphere lateralization

9 tweets · June 2019 · 14 likes · 0 retweets · read on Twitter

Replying to Charlie Awbery @_awbery_ ·

@QiaochuYuan Agreed! I listened to it a couple of nights ago. The journal pages I’m posting are retrospective, I’d written day 5 about a month before hearing that latest DY podcast with Culadasa. Lots of what he says fits my conjecture. Very interesting.

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan One thing I found striking is Culadasa's description of enlightenment in terms of the neurology, talking about the brainstem. I'm now super fascinated how this connects with @Meaningness' depiction of the different Results of sutrayana & tantrayana.

Malcolm Ocean 🏴‍☠️ @Malcolm_Ocean ·

Realized today I really don't have a good map of the different schools of Buddhism. Found this excellent chart by @Meaningness differentiating Sutra & Tantra. Now wondering: • Tantra = Vajrayana ? • Sutra = {Mahayana, Theravada} ? • what else is there? vividness.live/2013/10/23/sut…

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness I have posited that all forms of awakeness seem to have something to do with increased right hemisphere activation, but Culadasa's description in the podcast seems different!

Malcolm Ocean 🏴‍☠️ @Malcolm_Ocean ·

Oh! one thing I've been realizing is that it seems that almost everything people want to call "awakeness" is associated with right-hemisphere brain function. That is, they all involve an awareness of the limitations of re-presentation and a connection with what is present. 🤔🧠

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness Reading this Theravada quote (see adjacent tweets) it seemed that the subject in question was left-hemisphere attention (although as effectively integrated with right-hemisphere awareness.)

Transcendent Thinking @transcendence35 ·

@_awbery_ @xuenay "The integrative character of mindfulness is like the Minister-of-all-work of a King. He is wanted in putting through every project of the King. He is commissioned to organize and combine the workers and execute the tasks.

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness But then this distinction between LH attention and RH awareness itself comes from... Culadasa! Not sure of original source but this reddit post on /r/streamentry about McGilchrist's brain hemisphere work says Culadasa explicitly connects the two. reddit.com/r/streamentry/…

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness Meanwhile, tantric/dzogchen "result" as described in Spectrum of Ecstasy seems almost 100% about shifting to a primarily right-hemisphere-based form of consciousness. (Realizing now that this thread 👇 doesn't actually explain the relationship! #todo)

Malcolm Ocean 🏴‍☠️ @Malcolm_Ocean ·

1/ Reading Spectrum of Ecstasy (thanks @QiaochuYuan & @Meaningness!) ...and the parallels between it and Iain McGilchrist's @divided_brain model are... like 100%? If it weren't for the fact that IM doesn't use the term "non-dual", these pages could literally from IM's book.

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness So! I still have only the foggiest ideas of how these all relate. Would love to hear thoughts from @_awbery_ or @Meaningness on the subject! Or maybe that needs to wait for me to explain how I see the hemispheres as connecting to nonduality.

Malcolm Ocean 🏴‍☠️ @Malcolm_Ocean ·

7/ I don't grok enough about the brain or about tantric non-dual awareness to have a precise model for how they relate, but I feel like we're on the cusp of this and I'm really excited about that. twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/…

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness Oh! One further thought is that I have a felt sense of a subtle connection between some of the descriptions of renunciate practice in this thread, and the disembodied philosophers of the enlightenment, eg Descartes.

Charlie Awbery @_awbery_ ·

@SupernormalMind @xuenay That’s from commentary on the section where monks are advised to contemplate the repulsiveness of the body. I’m much in favor of non-renunciative approaches and ideas. I don’t find them in the Sattipathana sutta.

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness Sense of "the body is a problem but by breaking it into parts we can reject it thoroughly." Here's Descartes re: the body, from McGilchrist's book, The Master and his Emissary. The screenshots are in two pairs—there's a jump of a few pages between them.

@_awbery_ @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness Now I'm wondering "was Buddhism originally like this, or did it evolve to be?" (Similar to the absurd opulence & authoritarianism of the Catholic church—absurd because it calls itself Christian and Christ seemed quite opposed to such opulence & authoritarianism.)