Reading Diamond: A Paradox Logic It's pretty cool. Parts are very approachable, then suddenly it's dense math that I can barely follow. Will post quotes/excerpts I like.

5 tweets · December 2019 · 34 likes · 6 retweets · read on Twitter
Reading Diamond: A Paradox Logic It's pretty cool. Parts are very approachable, then suddenly it's dense math that I can barely follow. Will post quotes/excerpts I like.

where “=” denotes “is confused with”
Shared this with a friend who has studied both math itself & math education @ PhD level and he said:

Related:
Analogy between certain paradoxes (eg "this sentence is a lie") & physical oscillating "buzzers". Goes back & forth: on implies off implies on, 1 implies 0 implies 1. Diamond: A Paradox Logic has more values than "true" & "false". Also has "true but false" & "false but true".


