Very powerful thread—didn't go where I expected. Really appreciating the nuance & context-sensitivity described below. This isn't "for the sake" of anything but consciously working with language & meaning with situational awareness. t.co/bYuKanUnOd
6 tweets · July 2020 · 12 likes · 1 retweets · read on Twitter
Very powerful thread—didn't go where I expected. Really appreciating the nuance & context-sensitivity described below. This isn't "for the sake" of anything but consciously working with language & meaning with situational awareness. t.co/bYuKanUnOd
As I've started learning more about the dharma, I've been struck by the Buddha's apparent tendency to teach in third person rather than second person (imperative). Not "do this", but "the skilled practitioner does this and realizes such & such". Descriptive, not prescriptive.
@JasnaSeishin's thread describes her surprise at the power imbued in her teacher's shift from "he/bhikkhu(monks)" to "she/bhikkhuni(nun)". It unlocked some new sense of seeing herself in the teaching. twitter.com/JasnaSeishin/s…
This then seems like a more generalizeable principle: Seek to communicate (eg) the dharma in ways that invite people to recognize themselves in it.
Gender is only one dimension. Ironically, it probably works less potently in the opposite direction. How do you say "MEN ♂️" when "men" means "people"? (Separately but relatedly, what good is saying "men" when most men don't really feel a meaningful connection with manhood?)
I have more questions than answers! 🙃 One thing it highlights though is the importance of having multiple role models for learning a subtle different way of being, so you can say "people—people like you—like you have learned this! yes, you in particular"